🔗 Share this article

A veteran military journalist remembers numerous occasions throughout his years reporting on the Department of Defense when the actual story differed substantially from the official account.

After the fall of Baghdad in 2003, the at that time defense secretary was openly overjoyed, insisting it signaled the triumph of the US invasion. Yet, through informal conversations with personnel, the reporter quickly discovered a more complex situation: additional forces were needed to protect logistical routes being targeted by supporters of the former regime.

“Was I, as a journalist, seeking out information?” they stated. “Naturally. That is the essence of journalism. Finding out the actual events away from public view and refusing to accept completely what any government says.

This journalist is among numerous defense correspondents facing the loss of their credentials after refusing to accept a controversial directive from the defense chief. The rule would force reporters to sign an agreement stating they will solely report information “explicitly authorized” by the defense department.

Shift from Overseers to Government Agents

Agreeing to such an document would effectively transform reporters “from independent observers into government mouthpieces”, as noted by a former head of a major press association and former editor of a international wire service.

This journalist is not alone. Media outlets including leading publications, wire services, and digital outlets – including some with conservative audiences – are rejecting the ultimatum.

Unsurprisingly, a outlet widely regarded as a state-friendly broadcaster has consented to sign.

Television Outlets Join the Protest

In a major development, the major TV networks – including those considered supportive of the government – issued a unified message expressing their rejection.

“The directive is unprecedented and endangers core journalistic protections,” they announced. “We will continue to report on the armed forces as each of our organizations has done for generations, maintaining the principles of a independent media.”

This near-unanimous position is justified – and it is heartening to witness such solidarity. This kind of journalistic cohesion is formidable – and society could use much more of it, especially when the press are frequently targeted.

Journalism vs. Stenography

No matter how much the Pentagon leadership might wish it, reporting is not mere transcription, and the officially approved narrative is frequently only a beginning for deeper reporting that reveals the truth.

The directive has been characterized as a “assault on facts” that clearly threatens the intent of free press guarantees and erodes the public’s right to understand what their government is doing.

The defense chief's response to this widespread defiance was marked by a childish display of digital icons on social media, dismissing outlets that declined to comply.

Intensification of Media Controls

This newest action represents an escalation in restrictive measures. Not only does the Pentagon rarely hold media availabilities now, but previously it also banned journalists from most of the building without an official escort. This departure from past practice impeded the capacity of correspondents to gather nuanced information through everyday interactions.

Under the new policy, journalists could be labeled a threat simply for inquiring defense personnel for confidential information.

Persistence of The Press

It is clear that journalists and their organizations will persist to report on the activities of the Pentagon, informing the public about their leaders' actions.

Credentials isn’t everything. In fact, the professional pursuit for access to influential figures and institutions – and the desire to maintain that access – may hinder accurate reporting.

As a former journalist observed, the press can keep doing their jobs through methods besides relaying government-sanctioned information to the public.

“Reporting of the military can be pursued through leaks, public records requests, and additional collaborative methods harnessing the protections of the law,” the journalist stated. And they can persist in this work, they added, “till this benighted regime sees out its days.”