🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

A letter obtained by media sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting modifications of a pending law that include lowering the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“As an elected official, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about industry interference with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” commented Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, the company recommends this be decreased to 30% or 50% “according to global recommended threshold”, delayed for at least 12 months after the bill passes.

The WHO specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings must cover 65% of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

BAT asks for the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, suggesting that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. The company proposes restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for different infractions “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

Via documentation, the managing director of the African subsidiary states the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions operated within the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he stated.

“We exist in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my property and harvest that and distribute the goods – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The corporate communicator commented: “BAT Zambia conducts its operations according with applicable local laws. Additionally, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which allow for interested party involvement in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, noting that underage people should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” they said, adding that the corporation's recommendations “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which encompasses increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.